By Compliance on 1/7/2015 4:11 PM


Representative Todd Young (R-Ind) introduced H.R. 30, along with 147 cosponsors, to increase the definition of a full time employee from 30 hours per week or more to 40 hours per week or more as it relates to the Play or Pay provisions of Health Care Reform. The House will vote on the Bill later this week.

A similar bill is expected to be introduced in the Senate.

The White House issued a statement that the bill would be vetoed if passed.

By Compliance on 12/30/2014 9:15 AM

Joint guidance from the Treasury Department, IRS and Department of Health and Human Services provides proposed changes to the format and glossary of terms for the summary of benefits and coverage (SBC) that health plans are to provide to individuals for the first open enrollment period or plan year beginning on or after September 1, 2015.

By Compliance on 12/8/2014 9:22 AM

The Department of Health and Human Services has proposed a Transitional Reinsurance Fee (TR Fee) of $27 per covered life for calendar year 2016.

By Compliance on 11/24/2014 9:59 AM

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) has published the final regulations related to amendments to the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA).

One of the amendments confirms guidance that the Department of Labor provided earlier that employers need not provide certificates of creditable coverage after December 31, 2014.

By Compliance on 11/18/2014 8:39 AM

The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has issued a delay in the deadline from November 15th to December 5th for insurers of group major medical plans and for the employer-sponsors of self-insured group major plans to report the number of covered individuals for which they owe the transitional reinsurance (TR) fee for 2014.

By Compliance on 11/10/2014 1:49 PM

The Department of Labor has issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) Part XXII for implementation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The FAQ reiterates prior guidance that if an employer reimburses or pays for an employee’s individual medical insurance plan the arrangement is an employer payment plan and does not comply with the no annual limit provision of the ACA.

This guidance builds on previous guidance provided in DOL Technical Release 2013-03 and IRS Notice 2013-54, both of which we wrote about and were issued on September 13, 2013. Last May, the IRS issued a terse Q&Athat arrangements that reimburse or pay for individual medical plan premiums do not comply with the regulations and those employers that continue such arrangements or implement such an arrangement are in violation of the no annual limit provision of the ACA and are subject to a $100 per day penalty times the number of employees covered by such an arrangement.  

By Compliance on 11/3/2014 10:35 AM

CMS has announced that it is exercising its enforcement discretion to “delay until further notice” enforcement of the Health Plan Identifier (HPID) requirements. The announcement comes only days before many insured health plans and some self-insured health plans would be required to have registered for a HPID and begin using the HPID when performing HIPAA standard transactions on November 5, 2015.

This means that health plan insurers or employers that sponsor self-insured health plans that did register for the HPID need not use the HPID in standard transactions. Further, insurers or employers that have not yet registered for a HPID need not do so until further notice from HHS.

By Compliance on 10/31/2014 11:57 AM

Clarifying guidance from federal regulators confirms that only group health plans that are “major medical” coverage owe the TR fee. Major Medical coverage is defined as a plan that provides “minimum value.” Therefore, only HRAs that are considered to be major medical coverage and provide minimum value are subject to the TR fee. However, almost all HRAs are integrated with an employer’s health plan or are spend down accounts; neither of which are considered to be major medical coverage and do not owe the TR fee.

HRAs that are integrated with the employer’s group health plan or group health plan of another employer do not provide major medical coverage and do not owe the TR fee. HRAs that allow former or active employees to spend down their HRA account balances also, by definition, do not provide major medical coverage and do not owe the TR fee.

Therefore, only employers that provide a non-integrated HRA that reimburses an unlimited amount of medical expenses for employees not enrolled in the employer's group medical plan or group health plan of another employer have HRAs that provide major medical minimum value coverage and owe the TR fee.

By Compliance on 10/30/2014 10:26 AM
The IRS has announced that the annual pre-tax election amount for an employee will be raised to $2,550 for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2015.

Employers that amended their cafeteria plans to set the health FSA maximum at the “statutory maximum” do not need to amend their plan again since the plan can automatically be increased to the new “statutory maximum.” However, these employers will want to communicate to their employees that the maximum has been increased to $2,550 for plan year 2015.

Employers that have set the maximum health FSA election at a specific dollar amount will need to amend their cafeteria plans to change the health FSA maximum to a different amount up to the $2,550 amount if they so choose.

By Compliance on 10/30/2014 7:17 AM

Information in this posting is out of date and superseded by our latest posting on the TR fee.

Some employers need to take immediate action to register with the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) and report the count of the covered lives under their health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) by November 15, 2014 on Failure to do so could result in penalties for each day not timely reported.

The affected employers are those that 1.) Provide spend down HRA accounts to active employees that are not enrolled in the employer’s health plan or the group health plan of another employer; or 2.) Provide an HRA to employees that are not enrolled in the employer’s health plan or health plan of another employer; or 3.)Provide an HRA to their employees and the employer has no group health plan.

By Compliance on 10/21/2014 11:48 AM

Information in this posting is out of date and superseded by our latest posting on the TR fee.

An HRA is a group health plan that is self-insured by the employer. Some HRAs are subject to the Transitional Reinsurance Fee starting with calendar year 2014 and payable through calendar year 2016. Employers that owe the TR fee for an affected HRA need to register with the Department of Health and Human Services and complete the new TR Fee form on    no later than November 15th and pay the TR fee , either in full or as first installment payment, no later than January 15, 2015.

By Compliance on 10/6/2014 11:42 AM

The IRS has published three revised draft forms that all employers or insurers are to use to report coverage that an employee was enrolled in at any time during 2015 and for a large employer to report its offer of health coverage to its full time employees, enrollment in that coverage and its affordability.

By Compliance on 9/16/2014 7:47 AM

Employers that sponsor an HRA that provides minimum essential coverage (MEC) that is not integrated with the employer’s group health plan must report that coverage to the covered individuals on the plan and to the IRS in early 2016 for coverage provided in 2015 under Code Section 6055 reporting.

By Compliance on 9/2/2014 1:00 PM

The IRS has published two sets of Q&As regarding the Play or Pay reporting requirements for large employers.

By Compliance on 8/21/2014 11:50 AM

The Employers Council on Flexible Compensation (ECFC) has published an “employer alert” agreeing with the IRS that employers cannot pay for or reimburse the premiums for individual medical insurance plans their employees purchase.

By Compliance on 7/30/2014 12:07 PM

The IRS has published 4 draft forms to be used under the Play or Pay provisions of health care reform.

By Compliance on 7/22/2014 2:53 PM

In separate cases, two Circuit Courts or Appeal reached different decisions about the ability of individuals to be provided subsidies from federally facilitated exchanges. What’s next?

By Compliance on 7/11/2014 8:38 AM

Experts say the use of HRAs to comply with Health Care Reform and a new measure passed by the city will restrict an employer’s ability to use an HRA to satisfy the city’s health care spending law.

By Compliance on 7/9/2014 9:16 AM

Do you owe a PCOR fee for your group health plan or arrangement? If so, it’s due by July 31st and the IRS’ overview can assist with the calculation of the fee and payment.

By Compliance on 7/7/2014 11:33 AM
HHS is requiring health plans to obtain a unique Health Plan Identifier (HPID). Large plans need the HPID by November 2014. Does this apply to your health plan and are you ready?
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/30/2014 2:13 PM
In a 5-4 vote on Monday, members of the Supreme Court ruled against a PPACA provision that would have required every employer health plan to cover contraception. Now, "closely held" for-profit businesses can claim exemption from the provision based on their religious beliefs. The definition of "closely held" applies to a limited range of companies, mostly private, family-owned businesses.  
By Compliance on 6/30/2014 1:13 PM

Court finds that certain private for-profit companies can offer health plans that do not cover contraceptives.

By Compliance on 6/26/2014 3:29 PM

Do you have a waiting period longer than 90 days? Do you have an “orientation” period for new hires? If you have either or both, you’ll want to understand the compliance issues of the final rules.

By Compliance on 6/2/2014 10:47 AM

Employers and brokers warned by IRS that reimbursing or paying for individual health insurance is subject to an ACA penalty of potentially $36,500 per employee.

By Compliance on 5/27/2014 9:48 AM

Employers that owe the PCOR fee for their 2013 HRA or non-excepted health FSA can use the recently revised Form 720 for payment by July 31, 2014.

By Compliance on 5/23/2014 3:46 PM

Employers that owe the TR fee for their self-insured group medical plan or certain health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) should be aware of the TR fee payment process that CMS has announced.

By Compliance on 5/19/2014 12:25 PM

The Q&As provide answers to key questions on how the Play-or-Pay provisions apply to large employers.

By Compliance on 5/14/2014 7:52 AM

HHS has provided an additional special enrollment opportunity for individuals eligible for or enrolled in COBRA to purchase coverage through the Health insurance Marketplace to July 1, 2014.

By Compliance on 5/8/2014 10:10 AM

Employers and COBRA administrators will need to revise notices that are currently being used.

By Compliance on 4/30/2014 3:29 PM

If you have a high deductible health plan (HDHP), you’ll want to understand the difference between the maximum out-of-pocket (OOP) limits set by the IRS for an HDHP versus the maximum OOP limits set by HHS for a compliant health plan for 2015 and beyond.

By Compliance on 4/15/2014 3:53 PM

If you think the only ACA penalty you could pay is the Play-or-Pay penalty, you need to think twice!

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 3/28/2014 1:42 PM
The passing of the "Protecting Access to Medicare Act of 2014" through the House of Representatives on Thursday brought lawmakers one step closer to reforming certain provisions in the Affordable Care Act.
By Compliance on 3/27/2014 3:58 PM

This could be good news for small employers looking to keep health insurance premiums down.

By Compliance on 3/13/2014 2:14 PM

To assist with long term planning, HHS has set the fee for 2015 at $44 per covered life.

By Compliance on 3/7/2014 12:29 PM

The Treasury Department has provided simplified reporting rules for employers and insurers to comply with provisions of the ACA, primarily the reporting of an employer’s offer of quality health coverage to its full time employees.

By Compliance on 3/5/2014 4:19 PM

Individuals and small employers are granted further relief to renew health plans that do not comply with Health Care Reform.

By Compliance on 2/28/2014 9:40 AM

Since pre-existing condition clauses are prohibited under health care reform, do you still need to provide a HIPAA certificate of creditable coverage for an individual that is losing coverage under your health plan?

By Compliance on 2/25/2014 9:14 AM

Do you fully understand the maximum 90-day waiting period rules?

By Compliance on 2/18/2014 9:28 AM

Are you aware of the excise tax consequence if you offer a health FSA but you don’t offer a medical plan?

By Compliance on 2/10/2014 4:13 PM

If you have more than 50 employees, you’ll want to be aware of the relief provided by the new guidance for 2015.

By Compliance on 1/20/2014 3:46 PM

Were you aware that a premium subsidy is available from federally-facilitated Marketplaces (Exchanges)?

By Compliance on 1/15/2014 9:42 AM

You’ll want to know how this guidance could impact the design of your medical plan.

By Compliance on 1/14/2014 1:48 PM

Were you aware of the HHS guidance exempting retiree-only plans from the fee?

By Compliance on 12/23/2013 4:17 PM

Have you made your list and checked it twice?

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 12/18/2013 10:21 AM
The deadline for enrolling in health insurance coverage that begins on January 1, 2014 is December 23, 2013; a full eight days later than the previous deadline of December 15, 2013. It’s also just eight days until your first premium payment will likely be due on December 31, 2013.

Correction: Not long after the publication of this news story, the America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) board elected to delay the first month's premium payment deadline to January 10, 2014 to help provide additional piece of mind to consumers. Be sure to check with the plan you have selected for more details about your specific coverage policy. And click through to for more information and to read the full story.
By Compliance on 12/17/2013 4:51 PM

You’ll be interested to know how the IRS guidance provides for tax-free benefits for same-sex spouses.

By Compliance on 12/10/2013 4:49 PM

Employers that owe the Transitional Reinsurance fee for their HRA participants will want to take note of the installment payments proposed by HHS.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 12/5/2013 12:09 PM
The December edition of Spotlight Newsletter is available now!
By Compliance on 12/2/2013 2:58 PM

Although the online enrollment for SHOP Plans is delayed to 2015 coverage, the tax credit for SHOP plan coverage is available for many small employers.

By Compliance on 11/18/2013 4:59 PM

Obama administration is held to its word that …if you like your health plan, you can keep it.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 11/13/2013 5:17 PM
In the first month of operation, only 106,000 people enrolled for health insurance via the federal and state online Health Insurance Marketplaces, according to Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. One quarter of those people came through the flawed website which is used by 36 states; the rest of the enrollees selected plans from the 14 states and Washington D.C. that are running their own (more effective) Marketplaces. 
By Compliance on 11/12/2013 8:45 AM

Employers need to know if any employees are enrolled in non-excepted health FSAs to be fully compliant with the preventive services mandate of the ACA.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 11/7/2013 9:47 AM
As we wrote late last week, the US Department of the Treasury and the Internal Revenue Service changed the “Use-it or Lose-it” rule for Health Care Flexible Spending Accounts (FSAs). How will this change affect your participants?
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 10/31/2013 3:10 PM
The US Department of the Treasury (DOT) and Internal Revenue Service (IRS) have relaxed the rules for health flexible spending accounts (FSAs) today effectively changing the 30-year old “use-it or lose-it” rule to allow participants to carryover $500 to the next plan year. 
By Compliance on 10/31/2013 7:42 AM
Can an employer still reimburse employees for individual plan premiums through a health reimbursement arrangement (HRA) or Section 125 cafeteria plan?
By Compliance on 10/25/2013 10:31 AM

Renewing your health plan early? Don’t forget to amend your cafeteria plan.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 10/24/2013 1:06 PM
The deadline for the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate was clarified by the Obama administration Wednesday evening. Americans will have until March 31, 2014, not February 15 as previously thought, to obtain health insurance coverage or face a fine of $95 or 1% of their annual income (whichever is greater). Even with this “extension,” Senate Democrats are asking for additional time due to technical glitches with the problem-ridden
By Compliance on 10/21/2013 11:46 AM
Planning to renew your health plan early? You should know the COBRA consequences.
By Compliance on 10/17/2013 1:30 PM

The Transitional Reinsurance Program Fee (TR fee) was not postponed due to the compromise deal to reopen the government.

By Compliance on 10/8/2013 11:25 AM
Are you a small employer struggling with the cost of health insurance premiums?
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 10/8/2013 7:23 AM
We knew there would be big differences in health insurance premium costs found in the online health insurance marketplaces across states throughout the nation, but new information suggests that there will also be big differences within the same state, at the county level. 
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 10/1/2013 1:37 PM
It’s the day we’ve been waiting for, the online health insurance marketplaces associated with the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) go live today across the country. This marks a major milestone in the most ambitious US social policy program in five decades – it’s the first time millions of uninsured Americans will be able to go online, compare plans, and purchase individual or family coverage. But by judge of early reports (and our own testing in the federally-run Wisconsin marketplace), there are technical glitches, as well as a few last minute delays.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 9/24/2013 4:41 PM
Republicans are at it again; aiming to repeal Obamacare once and for all by defunding the health care reform law.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 9/19/2013 4:20 PM
Back in June, we posted an article about the huge publicity campaign focused on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) and the online Health Insurance Marketplaces. And now we’re starting to see the opposition roll in.
By Compliance on 9/19/2013 3:25 PM
Although earlier guidance left open to conjecture how some Health Care Reform provisions apply to health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) and flexible spending arrangements (FSAs), IRS Notice 2013-54 clearly indicated that FSAs are not subject to the annual or lifetime limit prohibition but HRAs that are not integrated with an employer’s group medical plan are subject to the limit unless the HRA covers only excepted HIPAA benefits, such as dental- or vision-only expenses, or is an HRA that covers only inactive employees, such as a retiree-only HRA.
By Compliance on 9/12/2013 12:22 PM

Curious about how the Supreme Court’s decision on same-sex marriage affects federal taxation?

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 9/10/2013 2:53 PM
Earlier this summer, the Supreme Court struck down Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA) which had defined “marriage” for federal purposes as a legal union between one man and one woman. The term “spouse” was considered to mean an opposite-sex husband or wife.

So what does this mean for same-sex couples when it comes to taxes?
By Compliance on 9/9/2013 12:12 PM
Regulators side on "state of celebration."
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 9/5/2013 11:11 AM
Send a "Notice of Coverage Options" to your employees and do it before October 1.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 9/3/2013 3:24 PM
The Wisconsin Office of Commissioner of Insurance (OCI) announced yesterday that it has completed its initial analysis of rate filings for the individual market for multiple areas in the state. According to their analysis, a 21-year old in the Madison area will face a 124% increase in individual premiums. A 40-year old faces a 73% increase in the same area.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 8/21/2013 7:17 AM
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) recently released additional resources via that will help educate the masses on new health care coverage options available under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA).
By Compliance on 8/6/2013 10:02 AM

Did you know that small employers in Wisconsin can purchase insurance plans with deductibles that exceed the ACA cap of $2,000 for single and $4,000 for family?

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 8/2/2013 9:51 AM
Yet another way the Obama administration says Americans will benefit from the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) is with Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) rebates which are set to be paid this week. 
By Compliance on 7/31/2013 11:28 AM
If you receive an MLR Rebate from your health plan insurer, do you know what to do with it?
By Compliance on 7/26/2013 9:07 AM

Before renewing your health plan early, you may want to think again!

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 7/24/2013 10:28 AM
If you haven't already, act quickly to make arrangements to complete and file excise tax Form 720 and pay the annual PCOR fees to the IRS by July 31, 2013 for plan years that ended between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 7/18/2013 10:57 AM
On Wednesday, the Republican-lead House voted for the 38th and 39th times since taking control in January 2011 to repeal all or some of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). They passed bills to delay both the employer mandate and individual mandate by votes of 264-161 and 251-174, respectively.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 7/12/2013 9:29 AM
In the wake of the recent announcement from the Obama administration that the pay or play mandate for employers with more than 50 full-time workers will be delayed one year, Congressional Republicans are amped up to extend that delay to individuals and families as well.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 7/3/2013 8:33 AM
Amidst pushback from American businesses claiming they don’t have enough time to effectively enact the new employer and insurer reporting requirements under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), the Obama administration has decided to delay the Pay-or-Play mandate until 2015. 
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/25/2013 3:24 PM
The Obama administration launched an all new this week. Largely FAQ based, the website’s new focus is on the public Health Insurance Marketplaces; what they are and how to use them in advance of the open enrollment period which begins on October 1, 2013. The website is being built to handle more traffic than which averages to just around 60 million users on an annual basis.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/20/2013 9:02 AM
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released reports on the progress being made on the federally facilitated exchanges (FFEs) required for health care reform as mandated by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) on Wednesday. And it’s not looking good.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/19/2013 3:47 PM
The sliding scale of subsidies available under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act are a little confusing, to say the least. How do you know what you'll get?
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/13/2013 1:05 PM
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) recently issued interim final regulations and guidance on the whistleblower provision of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA). The guidance specifically states that employees’ hours and pay may not be reduced for having received a subsidy to purchase insurance from the public Health Insurance Marketplace. One thing that isn’t immediately clear with this guidance, however, is whether the courts will view PPACA’s whistleblower provision applicable to an up-front reduction in hours so that the employee would be considered part-time and wouldn’t qualify for coverage provided by their employer in the first place.
By Compliance on 6/13/2013 1:05 PM
Did you know that employees who believe they have been retaliated against due to their activity regarding Health care Reform can blow the whistle on their employers?
By Compliance on 6/11/2013 8:37 AM
If you owe the PCOR fee this is good news!
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/10/2013 8:52 AM
President Obama spoke on the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) in California on Friday. He praised the health law saying that it’s “working the way it’s supposed to.” 
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/6/2013 2:01 PM
The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) posted an updated excise tax Form 720, with instructions, to their website on June 3, 2013. It was revised to include the fee owed to fund the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) Institute which is payable by certain non-excepted health plans for a specific period of time that is calculated by counting the number of covered lives under the plan.
By Compliance on 6/6/2013 7:44 AM
If your health plan, HRA or Health Care FSA is subject to the PCOR fee, you need to use the the revised Form 720.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 5/30/2013 4:01 PM
On May 29, 2013 the Obama administration issued final rules allowing employers greater freedom with their wellness programs. As it turns out, employers will be able to entice workers to participate in such programs by offering greater financial rewards or imposing penalties beginning in 2014.
By Compliance on 5/24/2013 9:05 AM

Two more bills introduced in Congress that would affect how HSAs and health FSAs work.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 5/22/2013 2:34 PM
The Oregon Insurance Division posted rate proposals for 2014 health plans to their Marketplace recently. The proposals, from 16 conventional carriers and two CO-OPs, that will most likely participate in their state-run Marketplace, Cover Oregon, beginning this October are marked with an asterisk.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 5/17/2013 7:38 AM
Simply put, a full-time employee is considered to be anyone working more than 30 hours per week, but sometimes it’s not that simple to determine which employees are hitting that requirement on a regular basis. That’s where the “look back period” comes in.
By Compliance on 5/15/2013 9:37 AM

What’s in a name? Did you know the government now refers to the public Exchange as the Health Insurance Marketplace?

By Compliance on 5/10/2013 12:38 PM
The Department of Labor (DOL) issued Technical Release 2013-02 on May 8th which provides the Model Notice to Employees of Coverage Options related to the Health Insurance Marketplace (referred to in the statute as the Exchange) as well as a revision to the COBRA Model Notice of Election to include information about the coverage options, in addition to COBRA, that may be available through a Health Insurance Marketplace.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 5/9/2013 2:52 PM
Finally, it seems, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) and the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) are ready to weigh in on the role of brokers in the Exchanges. The 12-page document issued on May 1 even goes so far as to say that “agents and brokers will play a critical role in helping qualified employers and employees enroll in coverage through the Small Business Health Options Programs (SHOPs).” That role in the SHOP, as well as all other Exchanges, and their compensation methods are outlined here.

By Compliance on 5/7/2013 10:19 AM
The inflation adjusted limits for qualified HDHPs and contributions into an HSA that were announced for calendar year 2014 will affect health plan designs and communication to employees regarding their HSAs.
By Compliance on 4/29/2013 2:29 PM
New SBC needed for 2014 to reflect key Health Care Reform provisions.
By Compliance on 4/17/2013 7:41 AM
Are you aware that non-calendar year cafeteria plans have been provided transition relief for coverage change elections due to the Exchanges?
By Compliance on 4/1/2013 8:13 AM
Today’s blog is from guest contributor Peter Antonie. The Affordable Care Act (ACA), aka Health Care Reform, provides for a new fee applicable to group health plans, including certain health reimbursement arrangements (HRAs) and some Health Care FSAs. The Patient-Centered Outcomes Research (PCOR) fee is payable for specific a period of time. When applicable to the HRA or Health Care FSA, this fee is paid by the employer that sponsors the applicable HRA or Health Care FSA. The total PCOR fee paid is a function of the number of covered lives under the HRA or Health Care FSA. Regulatory guidance allows the HRA or non-Excepted Health Care FSA to count only the covered employees as the covered lives.


The purpose of this fee is to fund research by a nonprofit institute into the effectiveness, efficiency and quality of care. The intent is that the research done by the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute will lead to lower costs in delivering health care and lower premiums for health...
By Compliance on 3/20/2013 3:36 PM
Many of the provisions in Health Care Reform are targeted at non-grandfathered, non-excepted health plans. As these plans renew, on or after January 1, 2014, several provisions go into effect that will impact the scope and breadth of what coverage those plans provide.  These provisions are of special interest to employers in the “small employer group market,” which basically means employers with no more than 50 employees.

Recent guidance from the Departments of Health and Human Services, Treasury and Labor makes it clear that these small employer plans will need to provide coverage for essential health benefits (EHBs) and that the out-of-pocket cost (OOP) to a participant for these EHBs cannot exceed the threshold amounts that apply to a high deductible health plan (HDHP). Currently, the HDHP maximum OOP is $6,250 for single coverage and $12,500 for any coverage other than single plan, subject to adjustment for 2014 and later years.

In addition, the small employer’s plan cannot have a deductible...
By Compliance on 2/28/2013 1:24 PM
Health care reform (or the Affordable Care Act) attempts to benefit consumers by making health insurance more affordable, transparent, and accountable.  To further these goals, the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL) recently announced an interim final rule that provides protection to employees against retaliation by an employer for reporting alleged violations of Title I of the Act or for receiving a tax-credit or cost-sharing reduction as a result of participating in a health insurance exchange.  Title I includes a range of insurance company accountability requirements, such as the prohibition of lifetime limits on coverage or exclusions due to pre-existing conditions. 

An employer may violate the Act if the employee’s protected activity was a contributing factor in the employer’s decisions to take unfavorable employment action against the employee.  Unfavorable actions include: firing or laying off, blacklisting, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, disciplining, denying benefits, failure to hire...
By Compliance on 2/22/2013 1:35 PM
This week, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a final rule under health care reform that outlines health insurance issuer standards related to the coverage of essential health benefits (EHB) and the determination of actuarial value (AV).  The final rule generally reflects the proposed rule issued by HHS last November. 

Essential Health Benefits

The intent of the rule is to ensure that non-grandfathered health insurance plans in the individual and small group markets are consistent in that they cover benefits and services in 10 separate categories, also known as “essential health benefits.”  Under the statute, EHB must include items and services within at least the following 10 categories as well as meeting limitations on cost-sharing and the actuarial value requirements.

1.      Ambulatory patient services

2.      Emergency services

3.      Hospitalization

4.      Maternity and newborn care

5.      Mental health and substance...
By Compliance on 2/15/2013 2:17 PM
Recently, the Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS) and the Treasury issued Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of certain provisions of health care reform, including the applicability of the no annual or lifetime limit provisions to HRAs and the use of HRAs to purchase individual policies. 

Under health care reform, plans and issuers of group health plans may not impose annual or lifetime limits on the dollar value of essential health benefits.  Essentially, an HRA, a group health plan, imposes an annual limit because it reimburses medical expenses (See Internal Revenue Code section 213(d)) only up to a certain dollar amount.  The preamble to the interim final regulations implementing the relevant section of health care reform clarified that an HRA that is integrated with other coverage as part of a group health plan would not violate the no annual or lifetime limit provisions because the other coverage that the HRA is so integrated with satisfies the no annual...
By Compliance on 1/31/2013 10:43 AM
The Employee Benefits Security Administration (EBSA) recently announced that the required notice that employers were to provide by March 1, 2013 to their employees regarding the coverage options available through the health care exchanges has been delayed until the necessary regulations and guidance are issued, probably by late summer or early fall 2013. EBSA is considering drafting model language that employers could download and use to notify their employees and new hires of:

1.      The existence of a state-based health insurance exchange and how the employee can contact the exchange to request assistance;

2.      A statement that, if the employer’s group plan share or allowed cost of benefits is less than 60% of such costs, the employee may be eligible for a premium tax credit if they purchase a plan through a state exchange; and

3.       Advice that, upon purchase of a plan through an exchange, the employee may lose any employer contribution to an offered plan as well as the opportunity...
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 1/2/2013 12:25 PM
On January 12, 2013, the House of Representatives passed the American Taxpayer Relief Act (ATRA) of 2012. This so-called “Fiscal Cliff” legislation is intended to avert the negative economic effects resulting from the Budget Control Act of 2011.

With the passage of this fiscal cliff legislation, Congress also addresses a few outstanding issues affecting employee benefits.
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 11/21/2012 3:52 PM

With President Barack Obama re-elected and the status quo maintained in the legislative branch (a Republican majority in the House and a Democratic majority in the Senate), implementation of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) will likely proceed as previously scheduled. There are still many unanswered questions and many vaguely defined timelines, but in the coming year, employers can expect a steady stream of guidance and clarification from the tri-agency task force (the Department of Labor, the IRS and the Department of Health and Human Services).

By Compliance on 11/21/2012 2:23 PM

On November 20, 2012, in an early Thanksgiving treat of sorts, the agencies issued a flood of proposed rules related to implementation of the Affordable Care Act. 

The proposed rules covered everything from key insurance market reforms (i.e., guaranteed availability and renewability of coverage, permissible rating factors for premiums, risk pool restrictions, and catastrophic coverage plans) to essential health benefits, actuarial value and accreditation standards, and expansion of employment-based wellness programs. 

The proposed rules will appear in the Federal Register on November 26, 2012. The insurance market reform and essential health benefit proposed rules will have a 30-day comment period and the wellness proposed rule will have a 60-day comment period. 

Look for more posts in the coming weeks regarding these proposed rules.  

By Compliance on 11/6/2012 10:19 AM
Happy Election Day!           

No matter where the results lie, expect a flood of regulations regarding health care reform to be released following the election, possibly as early as Wednesday.  The Department of Health and Humans Services has been quietly working on regulations, but has refrained from releasing them for the past couple of months in an attempt to avoid any controversy before the election. 

If Obama wins, then states have to face a Nov. 16 deadline to inform the Obama administration whether they will implement a health insurance exchange on their own, work with the federal government on a partnership exchange, or let the federal government operate the exchange exclusively.  The Obama administration will continue implementation work on health care reform for the next several years, but will likely work to put as many remaining pieces of the law into place as soon as possible. 

If Romney wins, expect the Obama administration to issue a flood of regulations fast. ...
By Compliance on 7/27/2012 12:17 PM
Now that the Supreme Court has decided the fate of the Affordable Care Act (aka health care reform), how does health care reform affect Health Savings Accounts (HSAs)?

HSA Basics

An HSA is a tax favored medical savings account that can be contributed to by, or on behalf of eligible individuals who are covered by certain high deductible health plans (HDHPs).  The account may reimburse certain medical expenses of eligible individuals, their spouses and tax dependents.  Because the individual owns their HSA and the account is not tied to an employer or to employment status, the account is transferrable and amounts will not be forfeited. 

Eligible individuals must meet several criteria.  For any month that an individual contributes to an HSA, the individual: cannot be another individual’s tax dependent, cannot be enrolled in Medicare, must have current coverage under an HDHP and cannot be covered by any other health plan that provides coverage for a benefit prior to satisfying the...
By Compliance on 6/29/2012 12:51 PM
Now that the Supreme Court has put their stamp of approval on the Affordable Care Act (ACA), what does this mean for employers and plan sponsors?  Employers and plans sponsors should work diligently to continue implementing ACA’s compliance requirements and should be prepared for a large amount of regulatory guidance coming forth from the agencies.  What follows is by no means an exhaustive list.

Quick review on what stays:

Plans must provide dependent coverage up to age 26; Non-grandfathered plans must provide preventative care without cost-sharing; No reimbursement from HRAs or Health Care FSAs for OTC items without a prescription; Plans cannot rescind coverage retroactively, except on account of fraud; and Enhanced internal and external claims appeal requirements. Requirements coming in 2012 and 2013 include:

Plans must provide a Summary of Benefits and Coverage upon application, enrollment, and re-enrollment in the plan (for open enrollment periods starting...
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 6/28/2012 1:40 PM

In a landmark ruling, The Supreme Court announced this morning (Thursday, June 28), that the entire Affordable Care Act is upheld. The legislation is deemed constitutional in its entirety. This means that all of the provisions of PPACA (Obama Care) - including the controversial individual mandate - will go forward as written.

By Compliance on 6/28/2012 11:03 AM
In a historic 5-4 decision that will affect all Americans, the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as constitutional, with a narrow reading of the Medicaid issue.  So, how did the Court come out on the issues and what was its reasoning for the majority opinion?

Anti-Injunction Act

The issue here is whether the Anti-Injunction Act (AIA) prevents the Court from deciding the case until 2014, when the individual mandate goes into effect and the tax is actually collected.  The AIA prohibits litigants from bringing tax disputes to court until a tax applies and the individual pays it.   

The Court looked to Congress’s intent in labeling the payment a “penalty” and not a “tax” for AIA purposes, but noted that a mere label will not control whether the payment is actually a tax under the Constitution for purposes of deciding the individual mandate issue.  Thus, the Court found that the AIA does not bar the Court from deciding the rest of the case.   Interestingly, the Court...
By Compliance on 6/28/2012 8:22 AM
The wait is over!  The Supreme Court has issued its decision on the Affordable Care Act.  Chief Justice Roberts has joined the left of the Court in finding that the individual mandate is constitutional, by a vote of 5-4.  Thus, the rest of the Affordable Care Act survives as well - with a narrow reading of the Medicaid issue.  More details to come once I read through the opinion.  
By Compliance on 6/22/2012 2:55 PM
After what’s felt like a very long time of “what-ifs”, the Supreme Court is expected to issue its decision on the Affordable Care Act (ACA) by the end of this month.  Some have called the decision the most significant case regarding federal power in a century.  Let’s review a few of the possible outcomes:

1.      Uphold ACA 2.      Strike down the individual mandate, but find it severable from the rest of ACA, ACA stands 3.      Strike down the individual mandate, find it non-severable from the rest of ACA, ACA struck down 4.      Decision deferred Uphold ACA

If ACA stands in its entirety, expect a mad rush at the state and federal level to begin, or continue implementation in time for 2014 when the insurance reforms are effective (though some states may gamble with the Presidential election right around the corner and Mr. Romney’s promise to repeal the law if elected).  States will be accountable for a greater share of Medicaid funding in the future, so other programs...
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 5/31/2012 12:33 PM

Late Wednesday afternoon, May 30, the IRS released new guidance regarding the $2,500 limit for health FSA salary reductions in the form of IRS Notice 2012-40. There were several key changes, including a clear determination that “taxable year” refers to the plan’s “plan year.” Therefore, the rule will not affect any plans beginning prior to January 1, 2013, and fiscal plan years will not be impacted until the first plan year beginning on or after January 1, 2013.

By Compliance on 2/23/2012 11:29 AM
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services, and Treasury – the departments responsible for implementing certain health care reform requirements – have released guidance on several key health care reform provisions effective in 2014.  The guidance – in the form of FAQs from employers and other stakeholders – covers automatic enrollment, employer shared responsibility, and the 90-day limitation on waiting periods and outlines rulemaking approaches under consideration by the departments and invites public comments.

Below find a brief overview of each health care reform provision covered by the FAQs and the key takeaways. 

·        Automatic Enrollment – Employers with more than 200 full-time employees and those subject to the Fair Labor Standards Act are required to automatically enroll new full-time employees in one of the employer’s health benefit plans (with adequate notice and the opportunity to opt out) and to continue the enrollment of current employees.  The FAQs indicate that regulations...
By Compliance on 2/23/2012 9:01 AM

Last week, the IRS released updated FAQs regarding reporting of employer provided health coverage on Form W-2. The updated FAQs incorporate guidance set forth in Notice 2012-9. Generally, employers filing more than 250 Forms W-2 must report the value of employer provided health coverage starting in calendar year 2012 (on Forms W-2 furnished to employees in 2013).

Find the FAQs here:,,id=237894,00.html

The FAQs include a link to a helpful chart that breaks down which types of coverage employers need to report on Form W-2.

Find the chart here:,,id=254321,00.html

By Compliance on 2/23/2012 8:58 AM
It’s been a busy week!

The Departments of Labor and Health and Human Services, along with Treasury/IRS, released a final rule on the health care reform requirement that group health plans provide a summary of benefits and coverage (SBC) to consumers.

Originally slated for March 23, 2012, the final rule requires plans with plan years that start September 23, 2012 or later to supply SBCs in their next open enrollment. Other changes from the proposed rule include:

· allowing the SBC to be incorporated into the Summary Plan Description (SPD) if the SBC information is intact and prominently displayed at the beginning of the SPD;

· permitting reasonable attempts to comply with the 4 page, double-sided, page limit;

· reducing the number of coverage examples from three to two (normal delivery childbirth and Type 2 diabetes);

· recognizing that if a plan’s terms cannot be reasonable described using the template, the plan or insurer’s best efforts to comply with the template is permissible;

By Compliance on 2/23/2012 8:57 AM
Recently, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued a statement indicating that nonprofit employers who, based on religious beliefs, do not currently provide first dollar contraceptive coverage in their health insurance plan, have until August 1, 2013 to comply with the rule. Some expected that such employers would be completely exempt from the rule because churches and other houses of worship are exempt. Since the statement was released, all sides have weighed in and tensions surrounding the issue are escalating.

In August of 2011, HHS issued an interim final rule, stemming from Health Care Reform, requiring most health insurance plans to cover preventative services for women, including FDA-approved contraceptives like the birth control pill and morning-after pill, without charging a co-pay, co-insurance or a deductible, effective August 1, 2012. In order to be exempt from the rule concerning contraceptives, an organization must serve primarily persons who share its religious tenets. After...
By Compliance on 2/23/2012 8:56 AM
Recently the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued interim final rules adopting HIPAA transaction standards for health care electronic fund transfers (EFT) and electronic remittance advice (ERA).


The interim final regulations implement parts of the Affordable Care Act – health care reform – which requires the adoption of standards to support and facilitate health care EFT transactions.

Health plans send health providers EFT payments separately from ERA because the information is sent in different electronic formats, through different networks and with different data for different business uses. The ERA contains information regarding the adjustments that the health plan has negotiated with the provider – rarely does a health plan pay the provider the exact amount that the provider bills. In turn, the providers use the ERAs to post payments, but cannot automatically link the postings to the EFT. Providers end up spending a significant amount of time manually reconciling...
By Compliance on 2/23/2012 8:54 AM
In recent blog posts, our guest contributor, Peter Antonie, summarized IRS guidance on Form W-2 reporting requirements and I’ve covered the $2,500 Health Care FSA limit. I’d like to send readers on over to our News Center for some excellent coverage of W-2 Reporting and the $2,500 limit.

Some quick comments on the $2,500 limit. We’ve received several questions regarding how the $2,500 Health Care FSA limit) applies to plan years that cross into 2013. Employers with plan years beginning at any point between February 1, 2012 and December 1, 2012 who plan to set a Health Care FSA limit above $2,500, should ensure that employees understand the implications of their elections.

Example: Company QRS offers a Health Care FSA with an upcoming plan year of February 1, 2012 – January 31, 2013. Company QRS does not set a maximum salary reduction contribution limit for the Health Care FSA. Edward is expecting some pretty high medical expenses for the upcoming plan year, so he elects $12,000 for his Health Care FSA ($12,000 / 26 pay periods = $461.53 per pay period in salary reductions). Come February 1, 2013 Edward decides to elect the maximum of $2,500 for his Health Care FSA ($2,500 / 26 pay periods = $96.15 per pay period in salary reductions). This will result in salary reduction contributions of $3,230.66 for taxable year 2013 (2 pay periods * $461.53 + 24 pay periods * $96.15 = $3230.66). Edward will need to be taxed on the $730.66 that exceeds the limit.

By Compliance on 2/23/2012 8:53 AM
2011 certainly kept us busy with health care reform taking up the bulk of our efforts. As we kickoff 2012, I thought I would highlight some of the upcoming issues affecting the benefits world.

Supreme Court & Health Care Reform – The Supreme Court will hear challenges to health care reform just as the presidential election swings into high gear. Expect oral arguments in March 2012 and a possible decision in June. W-2 Reporting – Beginning with tax year 2012, employers who file more than 250 Form W-2s must report the aggregate cost of applicable employer-sponsored health coverage on W-2s provided to employees (using Box 12 and code DD). Employers who file less than 250 Form W-2s get a pass until the IRS issues further guidance. See IRS Notice 2012-9 ( $2,500 Limit on Health Care FSA Salary Reductions – Although the limit is effective beginning in tax year 2013, non-calendar year Health...
By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 2/22/2012 3:32 PM

Beginning in 2014, health care exchanges are expected - indeed, mandated – to play a key role in the implementation of reform legislation. Exchanges are intended to serve and address consumers who don’t have employer-sponsored coverage or cannot afford employer-sponsored coverage. The basic concept of the exchange is to facilitate the interaction between insurance companies and consumers, using a common platform for comparison of qualified health plans.


By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 2/13/2012 4:08 PM

On Friday, President Obama announced that his Administration will implement a policy that seeks to accommodate religious liberty while protecting the health of women. Under the new policy, women will still have access to free preventive care that includes contraceptive services – no matter where she works. And as previously announced, churches and houses of worship will be exempt from the requirement to refer or provide coverage for contraception. But if a woman’s employer is a charity, hospital or other religious organization that has a religious objection to providing contraceptive services as part of its health plan, her insurance company – and not the hospital or charity – will be required to reach out and offer her contraceptive care free of charge. This policy has earned praise from a wide range of individuals and organizations, including many organizations that will be directly affected by this policy.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 2/10/2012 10:47 AM

In an effort to help consumers make more informed health insurance decisions, the Obama administration released new rules requiring insurers to provide clear, consistent and comparable summary information about their health plan benefits and coverage. Insurers must communicate what each health plan will cover, what limitations or conditions will apply, and what each service will cost, all in standardized and straightforward language.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 2/9/2012 9:20 AM

 A new report from Highlands, a leader in employer health care compliance and benefits management, finds that less than half of U.S. employees are ready to comply with healthcare reform provisions that call for the distribution of standardized Summaries of Benefits and Coverage (SBCs).

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 1/23/2012 2:15 PM

In a controversial, but not completely unexpected decision, the Obama administration announced this past week that health insurance plans, excluding specific categories of “religious employers,” must cover contraceptives for women free of charge. In August, the administration had made it known that it intended to require coverage of contraceptives for women, as recommended by an expert panel of the National Academy of Sciences, but the White House decided to reconsider the issue after hearing protests from the Catholic Church and prominent Republicans.

By Employee Benefits Corporation News on 1/10/2012 1:52 PM
The U.S. Supreme Court is preparing to make historical rulings regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s “individual mandate” or “minimum coverage” provision. Even if the “mandate” is deemed unconstitutional, there will be plenty of debate as to whether it can be severed from the rest of the legislation. They will be hearing testimony in March and will likely give their ruling in June or July.
By Compliance on 12/23/2011 12:17 PM
On December 16, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released a bulletin outlining its intended approach to rulemaking to define “essential health benefits” (EHB). 


Effective for plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2014, health care reform requires that certain health plans ensure that coverage includes an EHB package, which means the plan must provide EHB, limit cost-sharing, and provide either 60%, 70%, 80%, or 90% of the full actuarial value of benefits provided under the plan (known as “metal levels of coverage”).

The health plans that must provide EHB coverage include non-grandfathered plans in the individual and small group markets, Medicaid, and Basic Health Programs.  Self-insured group health plans, plans in the large group market, and grandfathered health plans are not required to cover EHB. 

The Secretary of HHS has been tasked with the role of defining EHB, subject to certain requirements and limitations spelled out in health care...
By Compliance on 12/13/2011 1:42 PM
On December 5, 2011, the U.S. Department of Labor’s (DOL) Employee Benefits Security Administration announced two proposed rules under health care reform that greatly strengthen DOL’s oversight and enforcement authority for MEWAs.    


In general, a multiple employer welfare arrangement (MEWA) is an employee welfare benefit plan, or any other arrangement which provides health coverage to the employees of two or more unrelated employers who are not parties to a bona fide collective bargaining agreement.  MEWAs are attractive to small employers who seek access to the low cost health coverage available to large employers.    

Although there are legitimate MEWAs operating in the marketplace, too often MEWAs have become a vehicle for criminals to defraud consumers and employers.  MEWAs take advantage of gaps in the law to avoid State insurance regulations (such as the requirement to maintain sufficient funding and adequate reserves to pay claims). 

Here’s how it works: employers...
By Compliance on 12/7/2011 11:17 AM
On December 2, 2011, the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final medical loss ratio (MLR) rule.  Under the final rule, broker commissions remain administrative expenses in the MLR calculation. 


In an effort to ensure that consumers receive more value from insurers for their premium dollars, health care reform requires insurers to spend 80% (individual and small group markets) or 85% (large group markets) of premium dollars on medical care and health care quality improvement in 2011.  Effective 2012, if insurers do not spend the threshold amount on patient care, as opposed to administrative expenses, then they must provide rebates to consumers.

In December of 2010, HHS issued implementing regulations of the rule, which became known as the medical loss ratio.  HHS requested comments and now that comment period has closed, HHS has issued a final rule. 

Final Rule

The gist of the original rule as described above has not changed.  Changes in the final rule mostly focus on technical issues in the way insurers calculate and report their MLR and the process for distributing rebates. 

By Compliance on 11/16/2011 12:07 PM
The Supreme Court has agreed to review several challenges to health care reform, most likely in March, with a decision in June.   While the fact that the court has agreed to hear the case is not surprising, the time allotted to oral arguments highlights the significance of the case and the complexity of the issues involved – five and a half hours instead of the usual one. 

The court will focus on the following issues:

Individual Mandate - Whether Congress has the Constitutional power to require that Americans obtain health insurance by 2014 or pay a tax penalty; At issue is whether the commerce clause of the Constitution allows Congress to essentially force all Americans to buy an expensive product for the rest of their lives.  Severability  - Whether the rest of the health care reform law survives if the individual mandate is found to be unconstitutional, i.e., whether the individual mandate can be “severed” from the rest of the law; Anti-Injunction Act...
By Compliance on 11/4/2011 11:58 AM
You may have heard that health care reform imposes a $2,500 limit on annual salary reduction contributions to Health Care FSAs, effective for taxable years beginning after December 31, 2012.  The $2,500 limit is indexed for inflation for taxable years starting with 2014.  As we await more guidance from the IRS, we’d like to discuss a few issues related to the limit and offer some examples to help you in the interim. 


Are Employer Contributions included in the limit?

Possibly.  Employer contributions to Health Care FSAs will not factor into the limit unless it is a contribution that can also be received as additional compensation (i.e., cash) that the employee allocates to the Health Care FSA.  This makes sense because the limit really focuses on employee salary reduction contributions to the Health Care FSA. 


Example: Company DEF contributes $500 to each employee’s Health Care FSA.  The contribution cannot be cashed out or used for any other purpose.  Jim may still elect...
By Compliance on 10/7/2011 12:04 PM
In August, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals rejected the individual mandate provision of the Obama administration’s health care reform law, that everyone must purchase insurance or be covered by an employer’s group health plan, as a “wholly novel and potentially unbounded assertion of congressional authority,” but upheld the rest of the law.  The Eleventh Circuit was one of three federal courts of appeal that have issued decisions on the law so far – all reaching different conclusions.  Many watched and waited to see the Obama administration’s strategy unfold.  Would the Justice Department seek a review of the decision by the full Eleventh Circuit (a condensed three-judge panel issued the first decision) or go straight to the Supreme Court? 

Although the Supreme Court petition was not due until November, last week the Justice Department filed their petition formally appealing the Eleventh Circuit decision.  The Obama administration asked the Court to uphold the individual mandate along with the rest...
By Compliance on 9/26/2011 7:40 AM
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) contains Medical Loss Ratio (MLR) provisions that require insurance companies to spend at least 80% of revenue on health care for small employers and 85% of revenue for large employers.  If the insurance company fails to meet these new standards, the new provision will require the insurance companies to provide a rebate beginning in 2012.

The loss ratio formula in PPACA differs from the way MLRs have traditionally been defined. Traditionally, the MLR is calculated by dividing an insurer's medical care claims by premiums. Under PPACA’s MLR formula, the numerator includes the insurer’s expenses for activities that improve health care quality such as education, counseling, care coordination, and wellness assessments in addition to medical claims. Additionally, the denominator of the MLR subtracts from insurer’s premiums all federal and state taxes, licensing and regulatory fees.

The HSA Council of the American Bankers Insurance Association in a...
By Compliance on 9/23/2011 10:28 AM
Beginning March 12, 2012, health care reform requires group health plans to provide a four-page summary of benefits and coverage (SBC) and access to a separate glossary with uniform definitions of specific medical and coverage-related terms to all eligible individuals.  The goal of the SBC is to provide consumers with access to information in plain English to help them understand the coverage they have or the differences in the coverage and benefits by health plans when they are shopping for a new plan.  In the August 22, 2011 Federal Register, the Internal Revenue Service, Department of Labor, and Department of Health and Human Services (the agencies responsible for implementing many of health care reform’s requirements) issued long-anticipated proposed regulations that detail the requirements of the SBC.  The guidance also includes templates of proposed formats.

The 34-page proposed regulations clarified that the statutory reference to a four-page summary actually means four double-sided pages in at least...
By Compliance on 9/15/2011 11:55 AM
As the third party administrator of Health Reimbursement Arrangements (HRAs), we have closely followed the implementation of various provisions of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA), better known as Health Care Reform, and how those provisions might impact the plans we offer.

One of the provisions is a prohibition on a health plan imposing an annual cap on the reimbursement of essential health benefits.  This no-annual limit provision went into effect September 23, 2010 and health plans that were in effect on that date and have an annual cap were provided the opportunity to apply for a waiver from the provision. Waivers must be filed no later than September 22, 2011. The waiver would allow the cap to remain in effect until the plan removes the limit, but no later than January 1, 2014.

By their very nature, virtually all HRAs have an annual limit that applies to reimbursement of expenses, which is the maximum funding of the account available to the covered employee, and family if any.

By Compliance on 8/22/2011 12:53 PM
Recently, a 2-to-1 majority of the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals, in Atlanta, found that the individual mandate provision of the Obama administration’s health care law is unconstitutional.  The provision, known as the “individual mandate,” would require Americans to purchase health insurance or pay a tax penalty beginning in 2014.  The decision was a victory for the 26 Republican attorneys general and governors who challenged the law on behalf of their states. 

The case essentially turns on whether the Commerce Clause of the Constitution – which allows Congress the broad power to regulate commerce – is so broad as to allow Congress to force individuals to purchase a product or pay a penalty.  The Obama administration had argued that, by making a choice not to purchase insurance, such individuals usually end up passing on the cost of their inevitable health care needs to hospitals, insured individuals and governmental agencies – actions that Congress can legislate under its broad authority to regulate...

Getting Started with RSS Feeds

Use an RSS Reader application or the latest versions of Internet Explorer or Firefox to subscribe to our news feeds. You'll need a news reader extension like "RSS Feed Reader Extension" if you use Google Chrome.

Use the following, if your RSS Reader application asks for a URL link.

For News Center:

For Compliance Buzz:



Recent Entries From Around Our Site

Executive Assistant - 1054
New Legislation Creates NARAB (1/15/15)
New SBC Format Proposed for 2015 (12/30/14)
Medical Mileage Rate for 2015 Announced (12/11/14)
Out of Pocket Limits for 2015 Confusing (12/9/14)


This Blog is made available by the authors and Employee Benefits Corporation for educational and general informational purposes only, not to provide legal advice. By using this Blog you understand that there is no attorney/client relationship between you and the Blog author.
Spotlight Newsletter